Social security, which is one of the most important safety nets for millions of Americans, is under threat as worries grow over its long term sustainability. The most recent modifications to the program do not come in a healthy financial environment. As stated in the Social Security trustees report published in May 2024, the revision forecasts that the trust funds, which cover disability and retirement benefits will last until 2035 at most. If no measures are taken, such exhaustion might cause a drastic cut of benefits entitlements for many present and future retirees, instigating anxiety amongst a large population dependent on such payments.
The Social Security funding gap
The issue stems from the difference between the gross revenue and the gross expenditures of the social security program. Primarily, Social Security is financed through payroll taxes, but such revenues have begun to fall behind the spiraling number of retired people, in particular, the baby boomers who are increasingly aging and living longer. Should there be no adjustment to how the program is underwritten, the trust funds would be depleted in slightly over ten years.
In a 2024 report to trustees, the Social Security Administration (SSA) discussed more than 150 options to respond to the projected shortfall. These options consist of ways in which revenue might be increased or benefits lowered, although the way forward remains politically hazy.
Whereas control of congress and the Presidency might change shortly, advocates and concerned legislators are discussing the possible approaches that would help in securing the sustainability of the program.
Potential Solutions: Raising the Wage Base
One of the major suggestions made to enhance the funding of Social Security is to increase or completely do away with the cap on earnings that are subject to Social Security taxes. As of the year 2024, Social Security taxes are levied only on the first $160,200 of an individual’s income. This implies that high-wage earners only pay Social Security taxes for a subsidized portion of their income. Some proponents of Social Security Reform argue that increasing or eliminating this ceiling would generate more revenue and close the funding gaps.
Alicia Munnell, who is the director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, also remarked on the significance of this proposal in a commentary published in August 2024. Munnell argued that lifting the restrictions on the amount of earnings that can be subject to tax would likely translate into the “most financial benefit” for Social Security as more revenues from payroll taxes will be realized.
While some policymakers prefer the idea of eliminating the wage ceiling, it is not without its opponents. It is claimed that higher earning people and companies might be burdened by this policy, which in turn might have implications for the overall economy. The elimination of the cap has, nevertheless, been one of the most contentious issues regarding Social Security reform.
Other Proposals: Benefit Cuts and Revenue Increases
Other remedies for the funding deficiency of Social Security suggest increasing the age at which individuals retire or modifying the benefit calculation plan. Such measures could reduce the program’s expenditure by decreasing the number of benefits over a certain period of time. Nevertheless, these proposals tend to be mired in controversy since they may cut the benefits of future retirees or elongate the age at which a worker is entitled to claim full benefits.
On the revenue side, paying for the proposal through increased payroll tax rates has been contemplated, as well as the identification of new sources of funds for Social Security. While these options might help to bridge the gap, closing the gap this way would require assent from both parties and massive public support for implementation.
Political Uncertainty
The tensions regarding the Social Security issues of solvency facing the nation demonstrate the lack of clarity regarding the future of the program. There are many possibilities as to which ones might be implemented, especially with regards to the upcoming elections in 2024 where both the Houses of Congress as well as the Presidency will factor in determining the right approach to implement. While some of the legislators advocate for increased taxes or even the removal of the wage ceiling, some focus on spending cuts or the stretching of the benefits. So long as an agreement is not reached, the solvency of Social Security will be a great concern not only for the future retirees but also the policy makers.
For now, however, millions of Americans still depend on Social Security benefits, optimistically expecting that timely measures would be taken for the sustainability of the system for the coming generations.
Related articles: Goodbye to Social Security payments – After the COLA, here are the big changes that could affect your paychecks next year
